Brian Grazer threw up on Jonas Salk.
He had worked for a long time to get an hour with the man who beat polio. They met in the lobby of the Beverly Hills Hotel. Grazer walked across the room and his nerves won.
Salk steadied him. Ordered orange juice for his blood sugar. Helped him clean up.
Then invited him home for an eight-hour conversation.
Grazer went on to produce Apollo 13 and A Beautiful Mind. But the habit underneath the films is stranger than any of the films. And it started with a boy who could not read.
The man who hired someone to keep him curious
Grazer was a dyslexic kid who spent school inventing ways to avoid his teacher’s eyes. Looking down. Firing paper clips. Staging a cough. He knew he could not answer what was coming.
Then he got a job as a law clerk at Warner Brothers. His work was delivering documents to powerful people. Drudge work.
So he invented a line. He told the assistants that the papers were only valid if he handed them over in person.
It got him through the door. And once he was in the room, he asked questions.
That small piece of theatre became a lifelong method. For thirty-five years he has sat down with a stranger from outside his world. He calls them curiosity conversations. About one a week.
Carl Sagan. Isaac Asimov. Two CIA directors. Edward Teller, who built the hydrogen bomb. Carlos Slim, then the richest man on earth.
Some took a year of letters and phone calls to land. A year of work for sixty minutes of talk.
He was not after facts. He wanted to sit inside a mind that had done something he could not do. What does it feel like to remove a disease from the world? What does a man tell himself after he builds the worst weapon ever made?
Never with a movie in mind. That was the rule.
When he got busy, he hired a person whose only job was to arrange these conversations. The New Yorker wrote about the role. It even got a title. Cultural attaché.
Read that again. A man employed someone full time to keep him curious.
What curiosity used to cost
Curiosity used to be expensive.
It cost you letters that went unanswered. Assistants who hung up. Twelve months of waiting for one hour. And on one afternoon in Beverly Hills, it cost a grown man his dignity in front of his hero.
The real tax was not time. It was rejection, in writing, from people who owed you nothing.
Now curiosity costs nothing. Which is why almost nobody tracks it.
My own curiosity machine
I have a place where I keep the things that catch me.
For about a year I have run a project inside a chatbot called Book Summaries. Whenever something snags my attention, I drop it in. A book. A research paper. A newspaper clipping. A stray article at 5am.
There was no plan. I followed what interested me and nothing else.
With each one I do the same four things. Summarise it. Argue with it. Connect it to something else I have read. Then sometimes turn it into a post, a framework, a product.
It is a curiosity conversation with a machine instead of a stranger. It happens before the sun is up, in silence, in a chair by a window. No letters. No year of waiting. No orange juice required.
Then I asked it a question I had never thought to ask.
The question that read me back
I asked: what have I been trying to understand?
Not what did I save. What have I circled, over and over, without noticing.
Five questions came back. Every one of them had already turned into a project.
What makes us human when machines become intelligent? That became the Human Signal.
What is still valuable when a machine can produce almost anything? That became my obsession with judgement.
How do we find work that feels chosen instead of forced? That became Zyrro.
How can one experienced person build extraordinary leverage? That became the one-person company I keep sketching.
How should knowledge change when the world moves faster than books can be printed? That became living books.
I had not decided on any of these. They had been deciding me for a year while I thought I was only reading.
The pattern is the person
Look at what happened there.
I did not choose five questions. I chose a clipping. Then another clipping. Then a book, then a paper, across a year, with no plan at all.
The pattern was built out of a hundred small yeses.
Researchers have mapped how this works. Suzanne Hidi and K. Ann Renninger describe interest as moving through four phases. Something catches you. It catches you again. It starts coming back on its own. And then it settles in and becomes part of how you see.
The turn happens in the third phase. That is where the thing stops needing to be triggered from outside and starts running on its own fuel.
You do not decide it. You notice it, late, the way I did.
We named ourselves Homo sapiens. Wise man. It is a generous title for a species whose real signature is the question.
And the oldest question we ask is this one. Who am I?
Most of us answer it with a borrowed word. A job title. A company. A degree. Something we did in 2011.
None of those are you. They are what you were paid to be.
Your curiosity trail is different. Nobody paid you for it. Nobody was watching. You did it for free, in stolen minutes, and it kept happening anyway.
That is closer to evidence than anything printed on a business card.
Where the energy lives
Here is the part that stopped me.
At UC Davis, Matthias Gruber, Bernard Gelman and Charan Ranganath put people in a scanner and showed them trivia questions. Some the person burned to know the answer to. Some they did not care about. When curiosity was high, the midbrain and the nucleus accumbens lit up. The brain’s reward circuit. The same machinery that answers to food and money.
Memory improved for what they were curious about. It also improved for unrelated material that happened to be in front of them at the same time.
Curiosity does not just make you want to learn. It changes the state of the brain that does the learning.
Read that as a life instruction, not a lab result. Your energy is not spread evenly across your days. It pools.
Most advice has this backwards. Find your motivation, it says, then apply it to your work.
The research points the other way. Lean into the thing that already pulls you, and motivation arrives afterwards, as a result.
I know this from the inside. In 2009 I did not start with discipline. I published, a stranger on another continent replied, something in me lifted, and I published again. The 4:30am alarm was never willpower. It was a loop that had begun to pay me back.
Meanwhile, four out of five people on this planet are not engaged at work.
That is not a character flaw spread across eight billion people. That is a fit problem at scale. Most of us are spending our best hours in a place where the energy never pools.
This is the problem I am building Zyrro for. It reads your patterns back to you, what you keep returning to, where your energy gathers, and what work would run on its own fuel instead of your willpower. The waitlist is open here.
The narrowing
Grazer’s method has one feature mine does not.
Salk gave him something he would never have known to ask for.
The machine answers what I bring it. A stranger interrupts what I bring.
And the interruption is getting rare, because most of what we touch all day is built to do the opposite.
Around eight in ten hours watched on Netflix come from what the system chose to put in front of you. On YouTube the figure has been put at roughly seven in ten.
Hold the two charts side by side. Eight in ten hours chosen for you. Eight in ten people flat at work. Different cages, same arithmetic.
Nobody set out to narrow you. It happens because the thing is being helpful. It learned what you like, so it brings you more of what you like, forever.
Helpful is not the same as wide.
A feed is a mirror that flatters. A stranger is a window that argues.
There is a second problem and it is quieter. The machine has manners. It meets me where I stand and almost never tells me the question itself is wrong.
A stranger has no such training. Take your marketing theory to a virologist and they will look at you the way you would look at someone who brought a bicycle to a boat race.
That look is worth more than a good answer. It costs nothing and it cannot be prompted.
Why the odd idea is the multiplier
At Northwestern, Brian Uzzi and three colleagues went through 17.9 million research papers across five decades of science. They wanted to know what makes a paper matter.
It was not raw novelty. The work that landed hardest was mostly conventional, built on the familiar ideas of its own field, with one intrusion of something unusual. A reference from a world that had no business being there.
Those papers were twice as likely to end up among the most cited work in science.
Read that as a map of a life and not just a map of a lab. Depth in your own field is the base. The strange import is the multiplier.
Grazer built a career on that finding without ever seeing the data. He was a film producer having dinner with a virologist. He heard a rapper on the radio and went to meet him, and years later that door opened onto films he could not have made from inside Hollywood.
He was making the atypical combination on purpose. One hour at a time.
My own strange import
I know how this works because it built my life.
In 2008 I was in a hole. A retail business I had opened had failed and closed. I was selling real estate to pay the bills. My marriage had ended and I had retreated out of the city to my brother’s place beside a lake, where I sat for the best part of a year and licked my wounds.
My own industry had run out of answers. So I read outside it.
Tim Ferriss showed me that work did not have to sit inside a building. David Meerman Scott showed me that attention could be earned with content instead of bought with money. Then a blog post from a software company said something plain: if you have an inkling of a business you want to start, start a blog.
A fitness experimenter, a PR contrarian and a marketing company had nothing to do with each other. Or with me.
I put them together anyway, and in March 2009 I started writing. Then I got up at 4:30am and did it again for five years.
Only now can I see it clearly. Those three books and posts were not a strategy. They were the visible part of a pattern I had been running for years without a name for it.
Try one this week
Choose someone outside your industry. Not a peer. Not a prospect.
Ask what problem they cannot stop thinking about.
Ask what outsiders get wrong about their work.
Ask what they believe that most people in their field do not.
Then carry one idea home and put it somewhere it does not belong.
One rule holds the whole thing up. Go in with nothing to sell. The moment you have a deal in mind it stops being curiosity and becomes a meeting.
Keep the machine too. It goes deep and it never sleeps. But depth with no width makes you an expert nobody can surprise, and width with no depth makes you a dinner party.
One gives you the answer. The other gives you the question.
The trail
A CV records where you have been. Your curiosity trail may reveal where you are going.
The things you cannot stop reading about are data. They are telling you what you care about, what wakes you up, what tension you want to resolve, and where you might have something to say that nobody else can.
Grazer’s trail is thirty-five years of strangers. Mine is a year of clippings and a machine that read them back to me. Both are the same act. Both are a person refusing to stay inside their own field.
Yours is already written. You have just never read it back.
The container you were handed is your job title, your feed, and your own good taste. It is smaller than you think.
Something bigger is standing just outside it, waiting for a letter.
What question have you been unable to stop asking?
There is a fuller version of you already there, sitting in your patterns and your energy and the work that lights you up. It is hard to see on your own. That is what Zyrro was built to do. Join the waitlist.
Further reading: Brian Grazer and Charles Fishman, A Curious Mind: The Secret to a Bigger Life. The Salk story is also told in Time.
The post What Your Curiosity Reveals About Your Future appeared first on jeffbullas.com.
* This article was originally published here
